*

It’s maybe the most quoted line fromMonty Python’s Life of Brian: “What have actually the Romans ever before done for us?”. Reg, the leader of the People’s Front of Judea, asks it of his group to galvanise them into taking activity against their oppressors.

You are watching: What have the romans ever done for us

The ridiculousness of the film’s dialogue, as the group details many of the things the Romans have actually brought to Judea, renders it abundantly clear that they’ve brought most benefits, if only he’d take a minute to think around it.

Both in the original film and its widespread usage the question is an excellent satirical tool. It inquiries the gut reaction, that the Romans have actually done nopoint for us, and also geneprices a more taken into consideration and deliberate response. I think we all know what it suggests when we hear that quote now: someone reels off a long list of benefits from a 3rd party resource and it’s practically obligatory to add “but what else have they done for us?” for emphasis.

These two means of responding, the instinctive reactivity and the considered response, loss into what deserve to be calledSystem 1andSystem 2 thinkingrespectively. This is an concept presented byDaniel Kahnemanand also explored in depth in his bookThinking Rapid and Slow. There’s a lot of nuance, however you can pick up the basic concept from just one sentence:

“System 1” is quick, instinctive and also emotional; “System 2” is slower, even more deliberative, and even more logical.

Just like many type of things, the Monty Python team were well ahead of their time, bereason Reg’s question “What have actually the Roman’s ever before done for us?”, intended rhetorically, is a perfect example of trying to apply System 1 (instinct) to a question that’s better answered by System 2 (deliberation).

The catalyst behind asking the question comes entirely from dischoose and also resentment of Reg’s Roguy overseers. It is speaking directly to System 1, aiming to prompt an emotional response. The question is untaken into consideration, and it expects the respondent to be unthought about in their agreement that, yes, I hate the Romans too and also no, they haven’t done anypoint for us; in truth rather the oppowebsite.

Yet in the film, and in the way the question is primarily invoked this particular day, the answer isn’t a System 1 agreement, yet a more thought about System 2 response:

“The aqueduct?”

Which prompts Reg’s own System 2 into activity because, yes, aqueducts are pretty useful:

“Oh. Yeah, yeah. They did give us that. Uh, that’s true. Yeah.”

“And the sanitation.”

“Oh, yeah, the sanitation, Reg. Remember what the city used to be like?”

“Yeah. All best. I’ll give you the aqueduct and also the sanitation are two points that the Romans have actually done.”

And so on, until it transforms out that, actually, the Romans have done fairly a lot for the Judean world, and System 1’s instinct was some method off the mark.

Yet, as is all as well regularly the case when System 1 dominates System 2, it’s still not enough to overcome Reg’s gut feeling: he simply ordinary hates the Romans:

“All ideal, however acomponent from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, watering, roads, a fresh water device, and also public health, what have actually the Romans ever done for us?”

“Brought tranquility.”

“Oh. Peace? Shut up!”

Sadly, it’s a long prcooktop phenomenon thatyou can’t readjust beliefs with facts alone, especially not as soon as those ideas are built on years of convention and also peer reinforcement.

Atderekwadsworth.comwe enrespond to this when we define that weoffer employees accessibility to their earned money through earnings streaming. Typical responses are “won’t that leave people short of money at the finish of the month?” or simply (and also vaguely) “isn’t that dangerous?”. The problem is that we’ve all come to be so conditioned to the monthly pay cycle that we’ve forobtained that many of us are practically constantly paid in arrears, long after we’ve done the work. (Or, as we at derekwadsworth.com regularly speak to it: late). It’s so ingrained in our working life that anything that difficulties our idea is rejected by System 1 and also, because we believe it so deeply,it takes even more than a little proof to change our minds.

Yet phrased in different ways, such as by pointing to employers that pay weekly, or saying that a labourer or freelancer is paid at the end of a day’s job-related, no such objections are increased. (Except probably from finance directors). Why shouldn’t someone be paid at the finish of a day’s work? It’s only fair. Asking a labourer to wait a month for their money sounds borderline imethical.

So also as soon as it pertains to the pay cycle we must ask our very own version of the question: “What have actually the Romans ever before done for us?”.

So all appropriate, apart fromflexible budgeting,staying clear of debt,reducing stressandenhancing staff retention,what has actually earnings streaming ever before done for us?

Rather than offering a solution that talks around “the finish of the month”, a response based on halittle bit and convention, it’s worth engaging System 2 andgiving it a tiny more consideration.

And also for the millions of employees still stuck on a monthly pay cycle, it turns out that acomponent from sanitation, the medication, education and learning, wine, public order, irrigation, roadways, a fresh water system, and also public health tright here is an additional thing that the Romans did for us.

See more: Inspired Educators Inc Worksheet Answers, Page Not Found

As much as I’m aware they never before trialled earnings streaming, but they did take us one or 2 procedures closer. Because if it hadn’t been forJulius Caesar and Augustus producing 2 brand-new months, we can have had a mere ten paydays per year. Just think exactly how much harder extending money to “the end of the month” would certainly be if that were still the case.

If you’re interested in earnings streaming for your organisation, obtain in touch.