It’s possibly the most quoted line fromMonty Python’s Life that Brian: “What have actually the Romans ever before done for us?”. Reg, the leader of the People’s former of Judea, asks it of his group to galvanise them right into taking activity against your oppressors.

You are watching: What have the romans ever done for us

The ridiculousness the the film’s dialogue, together the team details many of the things the Romans have lugged to Judea, provides it abundantly clear that they’ve brought a many benefits, if just he’d take a minute come think around it.

Both in the initial film and its typical usage the concern is a an excellent satirical device. It concerns the gut reaction, the the Romans have actually done nothing because that us, and generates a much more considered and also deliberate response. I think us all recognize what it way when we hear the quote now: someone reels turn off a long list of benefits from a third party resource and it’s nearly obligatory to add “but what else have they done because that us?” for emphasis.

These two means of responding, the instinctive reaction and also the considered response, fall into what have the right to be calledSystem 1andSystem 2 thinkingrespectively. This is one idea introduced byDaniel Kahnemanand explored in depth in his bookThinking Fast and Slow. Yes a lot of nuance, yet you can pick increase the general idea from just one sentence:

“System 1” is fast, instinctive and emotional; “System 2” is slower, an ext deliberative, and more logical.

As with numerous things, the Monty Python team were well ahead of your time, because Reg’s concern “What have actually the Roman’s ever before done for us?”, plan rhetorically, is a perfect instance of make the efforts to use System 1 (instinct) to a concern that’s far better answered by mechanism 2 (deliberation).

The motivation behind questioning the question comes entirely from dislike and also resentment the Reg’s roman overseers. It is speaking directly to device 1, aiming come prompt an emotionally response. The concern is unconsidered, and also it expects the respondent to be unconsidered in their covenant that, yes, I dislike the Romans too and also no, they haven’t done anything because that us; in fact quite the opposite.

Yet in the film, and in the method the question is normally invoked today, the answer isn’t a device 1 agreement, but a an ext considered system 2 response:

“The aqueduct?”

Which prompts Reg’s own mechanism 2 into action because, yes, aqueducts room pretty useful:

“Oh. Yeah, yeah. Castle did give us that. Uh, that’s true. Yeah.”

“And the sanitation.”

“Oh, yeah, the sanitation, Reg. Remember what the city used to it is in like?”

“Yeah. Every right. I’ll give you the aqueduct and the sanitation space two things that the Romans have actually done.”

And for this reason on, until it turns out that, actually, the Romans have done fairly a lot for the Judean people, and also System 1’s instinct was some method off the mark.

Yet, as is all too frequently the situation when system 1 dominates system 2, it’s still not sufficient to get rid of Reg’s gut feeling: he just plain no the Romans:

“All right, however apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, windy order, irrigation, roads, a new water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?”

“Brought peace.”

“Oh. Peace? close up door up!”

Sadly, that a lengthy proven phenomenon thatyou can’t change beliefs with facts alone, specifically not as soon as those beliefs are developed on year of convention and peer reinforcement.

Atderekwadsworth.comwe conference this when we explain that wegive workers access to their earned money through earnings streaming. Typical responses room “won’t that leave people short of money in ~ the end of the month?” or simply (and vaguely) “isn’t that dangerous?”. The trouble is the we’ve all come to be so conditioned come the monthly pay cycle that we’ve forgotten that many of us are nearly always payment in arrears, long after we’ve excellent the work. (Or, together we in ~ derekwadsworth.com often call it: late). It’s therefore ingrained in our working life the anything that obstacles our belief is rejected by system 1 and, since we believe it for this reason deeply,it takes much more than a small evidence to change our minds.

Yet grammar differently, such together by pointing come employers that pay weekly, or arguing that a labourer or freelancer is payment at the end of a day’s work, no together objections room raised. (Except possibly from finance directors). Why shouldn’t who be payment at the finish of a day’s work? It’s just fair. Questioning a labourer to wait a month for their money sounds borderline immoral.

So even when it pertains to the salary cycle we should ask our very own version of the question: “What have the Romans ever done because that us?”.

So all right, personal fromflexible budgeting,avoiding debt,reducing stressandimproving staff retention,what has income streaming ever done for us?

Rather than giving a solution that talks about “the end of the month”, a an answer based on habit and convention, it’s precious engaging system 2 andgiving it a little much more consideration.

And also for the countless employees still stuck on a monthly pay cycle, it transforms out the apart indigenous sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, publicly order, irrigation, roads, a new water system, and public health there is one more thing that the Romans did for us.

See more: Inspired Educators Inc Worksheet Answers, Page Not Found

As much as I’m mindful they never ever trialled income streaming, yet they did take united state one or two measures closer. Because if that hadn’t to be forJulius Caesar and Augustus producing two new months, we might have had a mere ten paydays per year. Just think how much harder stretching money to “the end of the month” would be if the were still the case.

If you’re interested in income streaming for her organisation, get in touch.